AIPAC and Its Influence on American Politics

By Admin, 27/11/2024

Don’t miss this one

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the United States, known for its unwavering support of Israel and its influence on American politics. Founded in 1951, AIPAC’s stated mission is to strengthen, protect, and promote the U.S.-Israel relationship. While it has achieved significant success in shaping U.S. foreign policy in favor of Israel, AIPAC’s role in American politics has sparked intense debate, with critics arguing that its influence undermines U.S. sovereignty and distorts democratic processes.

The Reach of AIPAC

AIPAC’s power lies in its ability to mobilize resources, influence legislation, and shape public opinion. The organization works tirelessly to lobby members of Congress, regardless of party affiliation, ensuring broad bipartisan support for policies that align with its goals. It hosts an annual policy conference that draws thousands of attendees, including prominent politicians, business leaders, and activists. This event often serves as a platform for showcasing unwavering U.S. commitment to Israel despite holding apartheid status.

AIPAC also channels significant financial support to political campaigns through affiliated Political Action Committees (PACs) and donor networks. While AIPAC itself does not directly donate to candidates, its recommendations and endorsements carry considerable weight, influencing the flow of campaign contributions from pro-Israel donors.

Legislative Influence

AIPAC has successfully advocated for legislation that strengthens U.S.-Israel ties, including military aid packages, defense cooperation agreements, and trade partnerships. For instance, it played a pivotal role in securing the 2016 Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. and Israel, which committed $38 billion in military aid over ten years. AIPAC has also been instrumental in shaping U.S. policy toward the Middle East, particularly in countering perceived threats from Iran as they did with Iraq which resulted in a distastrous western   war against the Iraqis for unfounded claims.m and led to the slaughter of more than million Iraqis.  

AIPAC’s illegal influence as a foreign organisation  extends beyond fostering bilateral relations. They contend that the organisation threatens and bullies  the lawmakers to adopt policies that do not align with broader U.S. interests. For example, AIPAC has been a vocal opponent of the Iran nuclear deal, lobbying Congress to impose stricter sanctions and take a hardline stance that some believe could escalate tensions in the region. It also strongly  supports  the ongoing genocide and starvation that  Israel is still carrying out in Gaza and Lebanon.  

Controversies and Criticism

AIPAC’s shameless  interference  in American politics has not been without  controversy. Critics from across the political spectrum have raised concerns about the organisation influence on U.S. foreign policy. It’s obvious that AIPAC’s lobbying efforts prioritise Israeli interests over American ones, undermining the principle of an independent U.S. foreign policy to serve far right Israeli interests and Israeli terrorist settlers.

AIPAC has also faced allegations of stifling debate on U.S.-Israel relations. Politicians and public figures who voice criticism of Israeli policies risk being labeled as anti-Semitic, creating a chilling effect on open discourse and discussion which limits freedom of specach and this is considered to be against the American constitution.  This dirty game  was highlighted in high-profile cases involving members of Congress who challenged AIPAC’s agenda and faced significant political backlash.

The debate over AIPAC’s influence reflects broader concerns about the role of lobbying in American politics. Critics argue that AIPAC exemplifies how well-funded interest groups can disproportionately shape policy, often at the expense of broader public opinion. to serve an apartheid entity that has been oppressing the indigenous people of Palestine  for decades.  

The question of how to balance lobbying influence with democratic accountability remains central to the discussion about AIPAC’s role in American politics. Transparency and open debate are essential to ensure that U.S. policies serve the national interest while respecting the diverse perspectives of its citizens. AIPAC support of illegal Israeli occupation should be condemned and banned.  

As AIPAC continues to wield significant power, its illegal activities will likely remain a focal point in discussions about the intersection of foreign policy, lobbying , and ‘democracy’ in the United States.

Watch

Posted in American Congressmen Terrorists, Palestinian art & culture, USA | Tagged | Leave a comment

Thanksgiving for Gaza

By Admin, 29/11/2024




In Gaza’s ruins, beneath the sky,
Where genocide and dreams collide,
Fourteen months of blood and stone,
You stand, unbroken, though alone.

Under occupation’s brutal chain,
Starved and silenced, yet you remain.
The world averts its guilty eyes,
But you expose its hollow lies.

Through endless grief, through crushing night,
You fight for freedom, claim the right.
To Gaza’s courage, thanks we give,
For proving resistance is to live.
Posted in Gaza, Palestinian art & culture | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Ten Mythologies of Israel

Astromystic, 8/12/25

Ilan Pappé’s The Ten Mythologies of Israel identifies ten foundational myths that distort the historical narrative of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, shielding Israel’s colonization, occupation, and violence from moral scrutiny. These myths, widely accepted in Western media and political discourse, serve to justify Israeli actions and delegitimize Palestinian resistance.

These myths, Pappé concludes, are not merely historical errors—they are tools of moral and political manipulation that sustain oppression and prevent justice. Challenging them, he insists, is not anti-Semitic but essential for universal human rights and peace.

Myth 1 falsely claims Palestine was “land without people,” erasing its vibrant Arab society under Ottoman rule. The myth’s second half, that Jews were “people without land,” is less critical but still used to justify dispossession.

Myth 2 falsely portrays early Palestinian resistance as “anti-Semitic terror,” ignoring that settlers were initially welcomed and resistance emerged only after colonial intent became clear.

Myth 3 falsely blames Palestinians for their displacement in 1948, claiming they rejected the UN Partition Plan or fled voluntarily. Pappé reveals these myths ignore the colonial nature of Zionism and the fact that half of refugees were expelled before the war began. He also debunks the “David vs. Goliath” myth and the claim that Israel extended peace offers—instead, Israel assassinated mediators and rejected peace initiatives.

Myth 4 falsely depicts pre-1967 Israel as a benign democracy, ignoring that Palestinian citizens were subjected to military rule, and Israel actively supported Arab regimes’ overthrow.

Myth 5 falsely labels Palestinian resistance as “terrorism,” ignoring its anti-colonial character and the global bias against Muslim-led liberation movements.

Myth 6 falsely claims Israel was forced into 1967 occupation and must hold territory until peace is achieved. Pappé shows Israel planned to annex the West Bank since 1948, and 1967 was the culmination of that plan.

Myth 7 falsely portrays Israel’s occupation as benevolent, with violence as a response to Palestinian resistance. In reality, Israel used collective punishment, denied rights, and unilaterally annexed territory.

Myth 8 falsely portrays Oslo as a genuine peace process. Pappé argues it was a Zionist strategy to partition Palestine into a fragmented “Bantustan,” excluding refugees and denying sovereignty.

Myth 9 falsely claims the Second Intifada (2000-2005) was a terrorist plot by Arafat. In truth, it was a popular uprising against Oslo’s betrayal, crushed violently by Israel, forcing Palestinians into more desperate resistance.

Myth 10 falsely claims the “two-state solution” is imminent. Pappé argues it’s a Zionist illusion designed to maintain Israeli control over the West Bank while excluding Palestinians’ rights to return, equality, and Jerusalem.

Posted in Astromystic, Illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine, News from the apartheid, Palestinian art & culture, Palestinian history | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Big Tech’s complicity in genocide: The unforgivable silence of online platforms

By Ziyad Motala, 23 September 2024

Source

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES – MARCH 23: A view of Google Headquarters in Mountain View, California, United States on March 23, 2024. ( Tayfun Coşkun – Anadolu Agency )

A damning report, “Palestinian Digital Rights, Genocide, and Big Tech Accountability”, by 7amleh, a Palestinian-led non-profit organisation that is focused on protecting the human rights of Palestinians, has laid bare the disturbing and active role that major online platforms and big tech companies play in perpetuating human rights abuses against Palestinians. While the world watches the horrors unfold in Gaza, the role of these digital accomplices cannot be ignored. The report highlights that platforms like Meta, X, YouTube and tech giants Google and Amazon have enabled, facilitated and even profited from these atrocities, effectively shielding war crimes under a digital smokescreen.

The findings are a harrowing indictment of how big tech companies, under the guise of neutrality, have become active participants in censorship, disinformation and incitement to violence. They have provided crucial infrastructure that underpins Israel’s military actions, allowing their platforms to be weaponised, silencing Palestinian voices while amplifying hate speech and calls for genocide. The complicity of these platforms is not a mere oversight; it is an entrenched system of deliberate decision-making that prioritises profits over human rights.

Systematic censorship of Palestinian voices

At the heart of the report’s findings is a shocking pattern of systematic censorship targeting Palestinian voices. Between October 2023 and July 2024, over 1,350 instances of censorship were documented on major platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, X and TikTok. These platforms disproportionately targeted Palestinian journalists, activists and human rights defenders, with Meta’s platforms being among the worst offenders. The censorship took many forms: accounts were suspended, content takedowns became routine and distribution of pro-Palestinian narratives was heavily restricted.

READ: Israel accused of using Google ads to undermine UN body

Meta’s manipulative algorithm changes played a key role in this censorship. The report reveals that during the ongoing war in Gaza, Meta altered its content moderation policies to lower the threshold for flagging Palestinian content, reducing the accuracy of its filters and triggering unnecessary takedowns. For Palestinian content, Meta’s filters operated with a mere 25 per cent certainty of a violation, compared to the usual 80 per cent applied elsewhere. These so-called “temporary risk response measures” were never lifted, allowing for an outsized level of scrutiny on Palestinian content creators. This is not an isolated incident – it’s a calculated, discriminatory policy that silences marginalised voices and hinders the free flow of information at a time when it’s needed the most.

As 7amleh’s report highlights, Meta’s broken promises to safeguard free speech, coupled with its biased content moderation, exacerbated the situation for Palestinians. Human Rights Watch had already condemned Meta for its systemic censorship of Palestinian voices during the war, with over 1,050 instances of content removal on Facebook and Instagram. In nearly all cases, this censorship targeted peaceful, pro-Palestinian content while allowing violent, anti-Palestinian content to flourish unchecked. Comments like “Free Palestine”, “Stop the Genocide” and “Ceasefire Now” were removed under Meta’s spam guidelines, reflecting a dangerous double standard that stifles legitimate political discourse.

Platforms as instruments of genocide

The report makes clear that online platforms are not simply neutral forums but have become instruments of incitement to genocide. Between October 2023 and July 2024, over 3,300 instances of harmful content – including incitement to genocide – were documented, the majority on X and Facebook. These platforms allowed high-level Israeli officials and other users to openly call for the extermination of Palestinians, dehumanising them as “sub-humans”, “animals” and worse. This genocidal rhetoric wasn’t limited to obscure corners of the internet. It was promoted, amplified and left unchallenged by the very platforms that claim to be committed to community standards and human rights.

For instance, on X, a December 2023 post by the deputy mayor of Jerusalem described blindfolded Palestinian detainees as “ants” and called for burying them alive. Although this specific post was eventually removed, countless others like it remain, fuelling a climate of violence and dehumanisation against Palestinians. This failure to combat hate speech directly contravenes international law, particularly in light of the International Court of Justice’s January 2024 order, which directed Israel to prevent and punish incitement to genocide.

These platforms are not just failing in their duty to protect free speech; they are actively facilitating the spread of genocidal propaganda. In the case of Meta, the report details how over 9,500 takedown requests from the Israeli government were sent to Meta between October and November 2023, with a shocking 94 per cent compliance rate. This high level of cooperation with a state actively committing war crimes raises serious concerns about the ethical boundaries of these companies. Meta’s decision to comply with such requests without transparency or accountability reveals a deeper issue: these platforms are willing to become tools of state oppression when the price is right.

READ: Israel using Meta’s WhatsApp to kill Palestinians in Gaza through AI system

The role of Big Tech: Project Nimbus and the automation of killing

Beyond the sphere of social media, Google and Amazon’s collaboration with the Israeli military under Project Nimbus casts an even darker shadow over the tech industry’s role in this conflict. The $1.2 billion cloud computing contract, as the report highlights, provides critical infrastructure to power Israel’s AI-driven Lavender and Gospel targeting systems – systems that are directly linked to the mass civilian casualties in Gaza.

The Lavender system, in particular, functions as a tool for automated killings, identifying targets based on massive data inputs and feeding them into the Israeli military’s bombing campaigns. The report describes how Lavender alone identified over 37,000 potential targets, contributing to the deaths of thousands of civilians, including women and children. By providing cloud services to facilitate this mass-scale targeting, Google and Amazon are directly implicated in these violations of international law. Despite mounting global pressure, both companies continue to support Israel’s military operations under Project Nimbus, even as the civilian death toll in Gaza rises.

Hate speech and disinformation: A coordinated assault on truth

The report goes on to document a deluge of hate speech and disinformation campaigns, often spearheaded by Israeli officials and amplified by online platforms. These campaigns, which include the systematic dissemination of dehumanising content on Telegram, X and YouTube, have targeted Palestinians both inside Gaza and across the diaspora. The report cites three million instances of violent content in Hebrew aimed at Palestinians on X alone, much of it coordinated by Israeli state actors.

Perhaps most troubling is the Israeli government’s influence operation known as STOIC, which ran a disinformation campaign targeting US and Canadian lawmakers to undermine the work of The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). This campaign, orchestrated with the help of AI, spread false narratives that led to the defunding of UNRWA, cutting off critical humanitarian aid to Palestinians. This is not merely a failure of moderation but an example of how platforms can be weaponised for state-driven disinformation, with devastating consequences for innocent civilians.

Profiting from genocide: Advertising amidst war crimes

As if censorship and disinformation weren’t enough, the report also exposes how platforms like Facebook have profited from harmful advertisements promoting violence against Palestinians. The investigation found that Facebook ran ads calling for the assassination of pro-Palestinian activists and the forced expulsion of Palestinians from the West Bank. Meta profited from these campaigns, further entrenching its complicity in the human rights violations unfolding in Gaza.

READ: Google, Amazon workers protest billion-dollar contract with Israel

Meanwhile, YouTube ran ads from the Israeli government that used graphic imagery to sway public opinion in favour of its military actions in Gaza. Despite YouTube’s policies against violent content, these ads flooded social media with incendiary narratives, particularly in Europe and the US, contributing to the normalisation of war crimes under the guise of counter-terrorism.

Time for accountability

The findings of this report should compel the international community to act. It is no longer acceptable for tech companies to hide behind vague policies and empty commitments to free speech while facilitating the mass killing and silencing of a besieged population. The complicity of Meta, X, YouTube, Google and Amazon in these atrocities must be brought into the spotlight and held accountable for their role in enabling these crimes.

These platforms are not neutral arbiters of truth – they are corporations driven by profit, willing to accommodate genocidal regimes and turn a blind eye to the suffering of millions if it serves their bottom line. As the report makes clear, it is time for the world to demand that these companies stop profiting from the destruction of Palestinian lives. The silence and complicity of big tech are unforgivable, and they must not be allowed to escape responsibility any longer.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor

Posted in Gaza, Massacres & genocides, News from the apartheid, USA | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Sweet Taste of Resilience: Palestinian Dates

By Phalapoem editor, 4/12/2024

Palestinian dates are more than just a sweet and nutritious fruit; they are a symbol of resilience, culture, and identity. Grown in the fertile lands of the Jordan Valley and along the edges of Palestine’s rich agricultural plains, Palestinian dates have become a vital part of the local economy and an enduring emblem of Palestinian heritage.

The Pride of Palestinian Agriculture

Among the most prized varieties of dates grown in Palestine are the Medjool dates, often referred to as the “king of dates” due to their large size, rich caramel-like flavor, and soft, chewy texture. These dates are cultivated using traditional methods passed down through generations, reflecting the deep connection of Palestinian farmers to their land.

Palestinian dates thrive in an ideal climate, with abundant sunshine and natural irrigation from the Jordan River. These factors contribute to their exceptional quality, making them highly sought after in international markets. Despite the challenges posed by limited access to resources and the impacts of occupation, Palestinian farmers have persevered, ensuring that their dates maintain their world-class reputation.

Cultural and Economic Significance

For Palestinians, dates are more than a crop—they hold cultural and spiritual significance. Traditionally served during Ramadan to break the fast, dates symbolize sustenance and community. They are also used in countless recipes, from sweet desserts like ma’amoul (date-filled pastries) to energy-packed snacks enjoyed year-round.

Economically, the cultivation and export of dates provide a crucial source of income for Palestinian families and communities. However, the industry faces significant obstacles, including restrictions on land access and the challenges of competing in international markets. Despite these hurdles, Palestinian dates have carved out a niche as a product of both quality and purpose.

A Symbol of Resistance

Buying Palestinian dates is not just a culinary choice; it is also an act of solidarity. By choosing Palestinian-grown dates, consumers around the world support farmers who continue to cultivate their lands against all odds. These purchases contribute to sustaining livelihoods, preserving agricultural traditions, and strengthening the Palestinian economy.

Taste the Story

Palestinian dates are a reminder of the resilience, determination, and creativity of the people who grow them. Whether enjoyed on their own, paired with nuts, or incorporated into recipes, each bite carries the story of a land and its people.

The next time you reach for a box of Medjool dates, consider choosing Palestinian dates—not just for their flavor but for the meaningful impact they represent. Supporting Palestinian agriculture helps ensure that this symbol of heritage and perseverance continues to thrive.

Let the sweetness of Palestinian dates remind us all of the strength and beauty of a people deeply rooted in their land.

Posted in Palestinian agriculture, Palestinian art & culture, Palestinian cuisine | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Do you know?

Posted in Admin, Media | Tagged | Leave a comment

Exploring the Complexity and Uniqueness of Racism

Racism is universally condemned, but antisemitism “uniqueness” debate has become sterile and constitutes an “intellectual terrorism”. The question is why? Does suffering from  racism have universal or unique feelings? 

In contemporary society, racism remains a pervasive and deeply ingrained issue that continues to shape individual experiences, societal structures, and global dynamics. While the concept of racism is widely acknowledged, its uniqueness lies in its multifaceted nature, encompassing historical, cultural, institutional, and individual dimensions. Understanding the complexity of racism requires a nuanced examination of its various manifestations and impacts across different contexts.

One distinctive aspect of racism is its historical roots, which span centuries and have influenced the development of societies worldwide. From colonialism and slavery to apartheid, theft of land,  illegal settlements and segregation, the legacies of these oppressive systems continue to shape social hierarchies, power dynamics, and intergroup relations. The enduring effects of historical injustices underscore the interconnectedness of past and present forms of racism, highlighting the need for acknowledgment, reconciliation, and reparative actions to achieve freedom, justice and peace. 

Furthermore, racism manifests differently across diverse cultural, ethnic, and national contexts, reflecting unique historical, political, and social dynamics. While overt forms of racism, such as explicit discrimination and hate crimes, are widely condemned, subtler manifestations persist in the form of systemic inequalities, microaggressions, and unconscious biases. These covert expressions of racism often perpetuate structural barriers and reinforce existing power imbalances, making them challenging to identify and address.

Moreover, racism operates at both the institutional and individual levels, influencing policies, practices, and attitudes within various social institutions. Institutions such as education, healthcare, criminal justice, and employment often reflect and perpetuate racial disparities, resulting in unequal access to opportunities, resources, and services for marginalized groups. Concurrently, individual attitudes and beliefs about race shape interpersonal interactions, perceptions, and behaviors, contributing to the reproduction of racial stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination.

The uniqueness of racism also lies in its intersectionality, as it intersects with other forms of oppression, including sexism, classism, ableism, and homophobia. Individuals who belong to multiple marginalized groups often experience compounded forms of discrimination, amplifying their vulnerability and limiting their access to social, economic, and political opportunities. Intersectional approaches to combating racism recognize the interconnected nature of oppression and advocate for inclusive strategies that address the intersecting dimensions of identity and inequality.

In confronting the uniqueness of racism, efforts to dismantle systemic racism require a comprehensive and multifaceted approach that addresses its root causes, structural dynamics, and intersecting inequalities. This includes implementing anti-racist policies, promoting diversity and inclusion, fostering intercultural understanding, and challenging institutionalized forms of discrimination and above all ending oppression, theft and occupation of others’ land.

Additionally, fostering empathy, allyship, and solidarity across racial and ethnic lines is essential for building collective resistance against racism and advancing social justice. 

Recognizing the uniqueness of racism requires acknowledging its complexity, diversity, and enduring impact on individuals, communities, and societies. By confronting racism in all its forms and dimensions, we can work towards creating a more equitable, inclusive, and just world for all future generations without exemption. 

On the hand, the exploitation of the concept of the “uniqueness of racism” by certain groups to perpetuate discrimination against other minorities is often regarded as a form of bullying and intellectual terrorism. This manipulation can lead to the intimidation of individuals, risking their employment and stifling their ability to speak out against apartheid, discrimination, injustice, and the fight for freedom.


Discussing the truth about Israeli atrocities in Gaza should be welcomed, respected, and supported as a means to aid the oppressed and hold perpetrators of genocide accountable. Exposing these truths should not be met with punishment or labeled as antisemitism or extremism.

Watch

Posted in Admin, Peace | Tagged , | 2 Comments

“We are still the victims”

Posted in Admin, Gaza, Massacres & genocides, Media | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Ceasefire Charade

Chris Hedges, 15/01/25

Source

Israel, going back decades, has played a duplicitous game. It signs a deal with the Palestinians that is to be implemented in phases. The first phase gives Israel what it wants — in this case the release of the Israeli hostages in Gaza — but Israel habitually fails to implement subsequent phases that would lead to a just and equitable peace. It eventually provokes the Palestinians with indiscriminate armed assaults to retaliate, defines a Palestinian response as a provocation and abrogates the ceasefire deal to reignite the slaughter.

If this latest three-phase ceasefire deal is ratified — and there is no certainty that it will be by Israel — it will, I expect, be little more than a presidential inauguration bombing pause. Israel has no intention of halting its merry-go-round of death.

The Israeli cabinet has delayed a vote on the ceasefire proposal while it continues to pound Gaza. At least 81 Palestinians have been killed in the last 24 hours.

The morning after a ceasefire agreement was announced, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Hamas of reneging on part of the deal “in an effort to extort last minute concessions.” He warned that his cabinet will not meet “until the mediators notify Israel that Hamas has accepted all elements of the agreement.”

Hamas dismissed Netanyahu’s claims and repeated their commitment to the ceasefire as agreed with the mediators.

The deal includes three phases. The first phase, lasting 42 days, will see a cessation of hostilities. Hamas will release some Israeli hostages – 33 Israelis who were captured on Oct. 7, 2023, including all of the remaining five women, those aged above 50, and those with illnesses – in exchange for up to 1,000 Palestinians imprisoned by Israel.

The Israeli army will pull back from the populated areas of the Gaza Strip on the first day of the ceasefire. On the 7th day, displaced Palestinians will be permitted to return to northern Gaza. Israel will allow 600 aid trucks with food and medical supplies to enter Gaza daily.

The second phase, which begins on the 16th day of the ceasefire, will see the release of the remaining Israeli hostages. Israel will complete its withdrawal from Gaza during the second phase, maintaining a presence in some parts of the Philadelphi corridor, which stretches along the eight-mile border between Gaza and Egypt. It will surrender its control of the Rafah border crossing into Egypt.

The third phase will see negotiations for a permanent end of the war.

But it is Netanyahu’s office that appears to have already reneged on the agreement. It released a statement rejecting Israeli troop withdrawal from the Philadelphi Corridor during the first 42-day phase of the ceasefire. “In practical terms, Israel will remain in the Philadelphi Corridor until further notice,” while claiming the Palestinians are attempting to violate the agreement. Palestinians throughout the numerous ceasefire negotiations have demanded Israeli troops withdraw from Gaza. Egypt has condemned the seizure of its border crossings by Israel.

The deep fissures between Israel and Hamas, even if the Israelis finally accept the agreement, threaten to implode it. Hamas is seeking a permanent ceasefire. But Israeli policy is unequivocal about its “right” to re-engage militarily. There is no consensus about who will govern Gaza. Israel has made it clear the continuance of Hamas in power is unacceptable. There is no mention of the status of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the U.N. agency that Israel has outlawed and that provides the bulk of the humanitarian aid given to the Palestinians, 95 percent of whom have been displaced. There is no agreement on the reconstruction of Gaza, which lies in rubble. And, of course, there is no route in the agreement to an independent and sovereign Palestinian state.

Israeli mendacity and manipulation is pitifully predictable.

The Camp David Accords, signed in 1979 by Egyptian president Anwar Sadat and Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, without the participation of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), normalized diplomatic relations between Israel and Egypt. But the subsequent phases, which included a promise by Israel to resolve the Palestinian question along with Jordan and Egypt, permit Palestinian self-governance in the West Bank and Gaza within five years, and end the building of Israeli colonies in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, were never honored or take the 1993 Oslo Accords. The agreement, signed in 1993, which saw the PLO recognize Israel’s right to exist and Israel recognize the PLO as the legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people, and Oslo II, signed in 1995, which detailed the process towards peace and a Palestinian state, was stillborn. It stipulated that any discussion of illegal Jewish “settlements” was to be delayed until “final’ status talks, by which time Israeli military withdrawals from the occupied West Bank were to have been completed. Governing authority was to be transferred from Israel to the supposedly temporary Palestinian Authority. The West Bank was carved up into Areas A, B and C. The Palestinian Authority has limited authority in Areas A and B. Israel controls all of Area C, over 60 percent of the West Bank.

The right of Palestinian refugees to return to the historic lands seized from them in 1948 when Israel was created — a right enshrined in international law — was given up by the PLO leader Yasser Arafat, instantly alienating many Palestinians, especially those in Gaza where 75 percent are refugees or the descendants of refugees. Edward Said called the Oslo agreement “an instrument of Palestinian surrender, a Palestinian Versailles” and lambasted Arafat as “the Pétain of the Palestinians.”

The scheduled Israeli military withdrawals under Oslo never took place. There was no provision in the interim agreement to end Jewish colonization, only a prohibition of “unilateral steps.” There were around 250,000 Jewish colonists in the West Bank at the time of the Oslo agreement. They have increased to at least 700,000. No final treaty was ever concluded.

The journalist Robert Fisk called Oslo “a sham, a lie, a trick to entangle Arafat and the PLO into abandonment of all that they had sought and struggled for over a quarter of a century, a method of creating false hope in order to emasculate the aspiration of statehood.”

Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, who signed the Oslo agreement, was assassinated on Nov. 4, 1995 following a rally in support of the agreement, by Yigal Amir, a far-right Jewish law student. Itamar Ben-Gvir, now Israel’s National Security Minister, was one of many rightwing politicians who issued threats against Rabin. Rabin’s widow, Leah, blamed Netanyahu and his supporters — who distributed leaflets at political rallies depicting Rabin in a Nazi uniform — for her husband’s murder.

Israel has carried out a series of murderous assaults on Gaza ever since, cynically calling the bombardment “mowing the lawn.” These attacks, which leave scores of dead and wounded and further degrade Gaza’s fragile infrastructure, have names such as Operation Rainbow (2004), Operation Days of Penitence (2004), Operation Summer Rains (2006), Operation Autumn Clouds (2006) and Operation Hot Winter (2008). Israel violated the June 2008 ceasefire agreement with Hamas, brokered by Egypt, by launching a border raid that killed six Hamas members. The raid provoked, as Israel intended, a retaliatory strike by Hamas, which fired crude rockets and mortar shells into Israel. The Hamas barrage provided the pretext for a massive Israeli attack. Israel, as it always does, justified its military strike on the right to defend itself.

Operation Cast Lead (2008-2009), which saw Israel carry out a ground and aerial assault over 22 days, with the Israeli air force dropping over 1,000 tons of explosives on Gaza, killed 1,385 according to the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem — of whom at least 762 were civilians, including 300 children. Four Israelis were killed over the same period by Hamas rockets and nine Israeli soldiers died in Gaza, four of whom were victims of “friendly fire.” The Israeli newspaper Haaretz would later report that “Operation Cast Lead” had been prepared over the previous six months.

Israeli historian Avi Shlaim, who served in the Israeli military, wrote that:

the brutality of Israel’s soldiers is fully matched by the mendacity of its spokesman…their propaganda is a pack of lies…It was not Hamas but the IDF that broke the ceasefire. It did so by a raid into Gaza on 4 November that killed six Hamas men. Israel’s objective is not just the defense of its population, but the eventual overthrow of the Hamas government in Gaza by turning the people against their rulers.

These series of attacks on Gaza were followed by Israeli assaults in November 2012, known as Operation Pillar of Defense and in July and August 2014 in Operation Protective Edge, a seven week campaign that left 2,251 Palestinians dead, along with 73 Israelis, including 67 soldiers.

These assaults by the Israeli military were followed in 2018 by largely peaceful protests by Palestinians, known as The Great March of Return, along Gaza’s fenced-in barrier. Over 266 Palestinians were gunned down by Israeli soldiers and 30,000 more were injured. In May 2021, Israel killed over 256 Palestinians in Gaza following attacks by Israeli police on Palestinian worshippers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem. Further attacks on worshippers at Al-Aqsa mosque took place in April 2023.

And then the breaching of the security barriers on Oct. 7, 2023 that enclose Gaza, where Palestinians had languished under a blockade for over 16 years in an open air prison. The attacks by Palestinian gunmen left some 1,200 Israeli dead— including hundreds killed by Israel itself — and gave Israel the excuse it had long sought to lay waste to Gaza, in its Swords of Iron War.

This horrific saga is not over. Israel’s goals remain unchanged – the erasure of Palestinians from their land. This proposed ceasefire is one more cynical chapter. There are many ways it can and, I suspect, will fall apart.

But let us pray, at least for the moment, that the mass slaughter will stop.

Posted in Chris Hedges, Gaza, Justice, Massacres & genocides, Palestinian history, USA | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

British Complicity in Gaza: Public Outrage vs. Government Support for Israeli Apartheid

By Phalapoem editor, 29/12/2024

The catastrophic humanitarian crisis made by Israel in Gaza has drawn starkly contrasting responses from the British public and the UK government. While widespread protests, petitions, and vocal outcries highlight a deep sense of solidarity with the Palestinian people among British citizens, the government’s unwavering support for Israel has raised serious ethical and political concerns.

The Public’s Growing Solidarity with Gaza

British public opinion has increasingly leaned towards a critical view of Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Massive protests in cities like London, Manchester, and Birmingham have seen hundreds of thousands taking to the streets, calling for an immediate ceasefire and an end to the siege of Gaza. These demonstrations, often led by grassroots organizations and human rights advocates, reflect a broad coalition of people—Muslims, Christians, Jews, and secular activists—united in their demand for justice and accountability.

Social media has amplified the public’s voice, with millions sharing images, videos, and personal stories from Israeli war on Gaza that underscore the ongoing  genocide. Public outrage has been fueled by reports of deliberate Israeli killing of tens of thousands of civilian, Israeli targeting of hospitals, schools, and refugee camps, and the Israeli calculated and deliberate plans of  starvation and dire humanitarian conditions resulting from the siege. A YouGov poll in late 2023 found that a significant majority of Britons supported an immediate ceasefire and wanted their government to take a more balanced and humane approach to the crisis.

The UK Government’s Controversial Stance

In stark contrast, the UK government has maintained steadfast support for Israel, framing its actions as a defense against terrorism. Sunak’s and Starmer’s administrations have resisted calls for a ceasefire, instead emphasizing Israel’s “right to self-defense.” This position, widely criticized as gainer international law, one-sided and dismissive of the catastrophic loss of innocent Palestinian lives, has alienated many Britons who see it as an endorsement of collective punishment and apartheid policies. 

Reasons Behind the UK Government’s Stance

1. Historical and Political Alliances: The UK has long-standing ties with Israel, shaped by shared geopolitical interests and historical alliances. These bonds have been reinforced through defense agreements, trade relations, and political cooperation, making it politically costly for the UK government to criticize Israeli policies openly.

2. Influence of Lobbying Groups: Pro-Israel lobbying organizations, such as the Conservative Friends of Israel, wield considerable influence in British politics. These groups play a pivotal role in shaping parliamentary discourse and framing the narrative around Israel as a key ally and a bulwark of democracy in the Middle East.

3. US Alignment: The UK often aligns its foreign policy with the United States, Israel’s staunchest ally regardless of the  grave concerns of ongoing breach by Israeli apartheid all aspect of Palestinian human rights. Washington’s  shameless   support for Israel places additional pressure on the UK government to maintain a similar stance, even in the face of domestic opposition which would question the credibility of so called democracy in these countries. 

4. Framing of Security: The government’s false narrative has leaned heavily on the framing of Palestinian resistance, a perspective that has overshadowed calls for addressing the root causes of the conflict, including decades of occupation, hundreds of massacres, ethnic cleansing, and apartheid policies. This false and dirty security-focused narrative serves to justify support for illegal Israeli occupation, despite the abhorrent and disproportionate and indiscriminate impact on Palestinian civilians who combine to suffer under Israeli racist rules.

5. Media Representation: Much of the mainstream British media and mainly BBC has echoed the government’s shameful narrative, emphasising unjustified Israel’s security concerns (as the case with all colonialist countries) while downplaying or misrepresenting the scale of suffering in Gaza and West Bank. This racist and biased coverage has provided the government with a degree of insulation from British public criticism, though alternative media like Al Jazeera and social platforms have increasingly countered this zionist narrative.

Public Backlash and Calls for Change

The disconnect between the UK government’s stance and the sentiments of its citizens has led to mounting calls for accountability. Prominent figures, human rights organizations, and members of Parliament have condemned the government’s position, accusing it of complicity in war crimes. The Labour Party, under Keir Starmer, has faced internal divisions, with many party members and supporters demanding a stronger stand against Israeli aggression.

This growing dissent has also led to a resurgence of interest in boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) campaigns targeting companies and institutions complicit in Israeli apartheid. Grassroots activism, coupled with increasing international pressure, suggests that the British government’s position may become increasingly untenable if public outrage continues to grow.

The British public’s overwhelming solidarity with Palestinians highlights a deep humanitarian impulse that contrasts sharply with the government’s political calculus. As the genocide in Gaza unfolds, the UK government’s unwillingness to confront Israeli apartheid not only undermines its moral standing but also risks alienating an electorate that demands justice, accountability, and a commitment to human rights. The question remains: will public pressure be enough to shift the UK’s stance, or will political interests continue to outweigh the cries for justice?

Posted in Gaza, Massacres & genocides, Palestinian art & culture, Palestinian diaspora, Palestinian history, UK | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment